Paul I appreciate that models seldom have a perfect complection, but soft focus can be overdone.
I'd have to see an original version to know if that much Gaussian blur is needed. Dave S On Apr 6, 2005 6:42 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have found only a handful of models that can withstand the scrutiny > of a sharp lens under studio lights. I would venture to guess that in > this case the softness was necessary. Do you have a sharp original to > show us Bill? I would guess these are PhotoShop softened. > Paul > On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:13 AM, David Savage wrote: > > > Of all of them I like this one best: > > > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/flannery/IMGP7188a_small.html > > > > But I agree with Doug the soft focus is a little overpowering. > > > > Dave S > > > > On Apr 6, 2005 12:09 PM, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:42:59 -0600, William Robb wrote: > >> > >>> This young lady needed some portraits for a poster, and for her > >>> school > >>> entrance. > >>> She wants to be a opera singer when she grows up..... > >>> > >>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/flannery/ > >>> flannery_index.html > >> > >> Nice looking young woman, and nice shots, but the soft effect doesn't > >> do it for me. I'd like the shots to be a little sharper. > >> > >> TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ > >> > >> > > > >
