only because there was such a large loss going from the original slide to
any other format. direct positives like Cibachrome added contrast and you
were stuck with its color renditions. copy slides at their best are good,
but not great. scanning has its own problems, the most important of which
was that a slide frequently would have more density than the scanner could
deal with. you can tell by looking at a slide and the scan whether it was an
accurate scan. you can't do it with negatives, yet a nice slow color
negative film is arguably sharper under many conditions. it certainly has
more dynamic range. when you can't fix it, feature it.
Herb...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images
I understand what your saying, but RAW is also euphemistically referred to
as a digital negative, and futher processing is implicit, where the same is
not true of transparencies, in general.
- Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images frank theriault
- Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images Herb Chong
- Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images pnstenquist
- Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images pnstenquist
- Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images pnstenquist
- Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images Herb Chong
- Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images Butch Black
- Re: Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images frank theriault
- Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images William Robb
-