only because there was such a large loss going from the original slide to any other format. direct positives like Cibachrome added contrast and you were stuck with its color renditions. copy slides at their best are good, but not great. scanning has its own problems, the most important of which was that a slide frequently would have more density than the scanner could deal with. you can tell by looking at a slide and the scan whether it was an accurate scan. you can't do it with negatives, yet a nice slow color negative film is arguably sharper under many conditions. it certainly has more dynamic range. when you can't fix it, feature it.

Herb...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images



I understand what your saying, but RAW is also euphemistically referred to as a digital negative, and futher processing is implicit, where the same is not true of transparencies, in general.

Reply via email to