On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Norman Baugher wrote:

> I was just being a bit humorous, the lens doesn't have the greatest
> reputation. However, considering the fact that you can get an M135 for
> about $50, I'd say it's in the ballpark.

Not the SMC 135/2.5. You can get the M135/3.5 for $50 (perhaps).

Kostas (note the SMC bit)

Reply via email to