No Black Hole here, that's for sure: http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/Flare3.jpg
Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 8:59 PM > To: Don Sanderson > Subject: Re: SMCT 135/2.5 results > > > > Those who own the SMCP 135/2.5: > > Is flare resistance in the K version better? > > Is focus travel as long? > > You know, I can't really say too much about the flare resistance of the K > 135/2.5 - I've used it as an "indoor informal portrait lens" almost > exclusively, so I've never really put it to any serious flare test much. > > I do know that it seems to be better than the Takumar Bayonet 135/"2.5" - > look at the comparative difference in reflections (or lack thereof at > http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/135's/135252.jpg . > > The focus travel (or throw) does seem to be rather long - it's basically a > rather old-fashioned lens - <g>. For what I use it for (an "indoor > informal portrait lens"), this is not a problem at all. > > Fred > >
