I alwasy sthought Pentax-F meant the AF lenses ealier than tghe FA-lenes. Like this: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=48558&item=7504887553 &rd=1#ebayphotohosting I guess this is referred to as "SMC Pentax-F"
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 8. april 2005 12:36 Til: [email protected] Emne: RE: SMCT 135/2.5 results I think the most confusing name Pentax has ever given a lens has to be has to be the Takumar (Bayonet) 135/2.5. I believe it's the first in their line of "economy" non-SMC K mount lenses. And I believe the first K mount to wear the Takumar name. We now have the Takumar-F (also called the Pentax-F) which are the economy grade non-SMC autofocus lenses. I've see a lot of eekBayers pay big bucks for these, not noticing the lack of "SMC" in the name. "Look for "SMC" on the label to be sure!" (Sounds kinda like an ad for a famous brand anti- perspirant doesn't it?) Don > -----Original Message----- > From: John Whittingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:19 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: SMCT 135/2.5 results > > > > Screwmount Takumars on Boz's site? > > Takumar 135/2.5 (Bayonet) > > John > > > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:11:07 +0100 (BST) > Subject: RE: SMCT 135/2.5 results > > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Jens Bladt wrote: > > > > > Juddging from the photograph on Bojidar Dimitrov's Pentax > K-Mount Page, I > b > > > elieve mine is the 6 element version. I didn't know there was > an earlier > > > one! > > > > Screwmount Takumars on Boz's site? > > > > Kostas > ------- End of Original Message ------- >
