Fuji now contends that the current Astia 100 is their
finest grain slide film.
I have shot everything, but Provia 100 has been my
choice for awhile. Astia's slightly lower contrast (as
I understand it) may be more scan friendly.
I've found Kodak G series to have grain size similar
to that of Provia, but not as smooth and even.


Jack
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Back when I paid attention to this, the answer was
> generally yes, IIRC.  
> Positive films tended to have finer grain than
> negative films.  Comparing 
> Kodak and Fuji was like apples and oranges because
> Kodak measured their 
> grain and differently than everyone else.  That made
> me suspect, and I in 
> general shoot Velvia 50 or Provia 100F.  Back when I
> last checked, they were 
> the finest grain films available.
> 
> Caveat... I'm remembering back over 5 years ago.  
> Sorry, I can't provide 
> any info for B&W.
> 
> Tom C.
> 
> 
> 
> >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Pos vs neg grain
> >Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >I had a lab owner emphatically contend
> that.."positive
> >film of the same ISO has finer grain than negative
> >film". Didn't address b&w.
> >We happened to be reviewing a b&w print at the time
> >and their existed a situation wherein the subject
> >couldn't be pursued (customers waiting).
> >I've since emailed him for a follow-up on his
> >recommendation that "b&w film be scanned as
> positive
> >film".
> >If his answer (if received) is at all decipherable,
> >I'll forward it.
> >Does anyone know or suspect what he may be talking
> >about?
> >I've, also, read the RMS charts but, their results
> >don't appear to be comparable.
> >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> >http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to