I debated whether or not to clone out that branch. I cloned one out of the upper right, but I kind of liked the one at the left. For the stock house I left them both in and cropped it looser. Paul
> Paul, good catch. Only nit I have with this is the extraneous branch in the > ULH corner. > > Kenneth Waller > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:45 PM > Subject: PESO: Yellow Rumped Warbler > > > > Checked this one in my bird book. I think I have him identified > > correctly. It's with the *istD at ISO 800, f11 @ 1000, fill from the > > Sigma 500DG Super flash. I could have gone to ISO 400 on this one, but > > most bird shots are in open shade, so I usually keep the camera at 800 > > when walking through the woods. This is about a 2X crop, so you'll see > > some digital noise. As Herb pointed out earlier today, a 400 is a bit > > short for shooting shy little birds in the wild. But it's still fun. At > > the highest interpolation level from the Adobe RAW converter I end up > > with about a 40meg image after crop. That still makes the minimum > > resolution for my stock house, but I'd like to do better. > > Anyway, enough talk. It's here: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3265548&size=lg > > >
