See details enlarged in my 2003 test:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/t04p7e.htm
Scroll down, almost to the end of the page, where you can see crops enlarged 400%.
Yes, I know that pictures are not meant to be observed 400%. These crops just show that RAW conversion has to be made far better than that if you want to print large prints retaining natural look.
Dario www.dariobonazza.com
----- Original Message ----- From: "Johannes Schwab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 12:40 AM
Subject: Test of details: RAWShooter Essentials vs. Pentax Photolaboratory
Hello together,
having downloaded RSE 2005 and tested it, I mutated to a real fan of this freeware product.
Yesterday I put it to the test with the Pentax Photolaboratory an got some impressive results:
http://www.im-auftrag-des-herrn-unterwegs.de/pentax/rawtest/ (in German!)
For those of you who are not able to understand my German, Google _tries_ to transalte it for you: :-)
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.im-auftrag-des-herrn-unterwegs.de%2Fpentax%2Frawtest%2F&langpair=de%7Cen&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools
In my eyes, RSE is the winner. It should be visible IMHO...
The test is probably discussed in the German forum digitalfotonetz.de in thread http://forum.digitalfotonetz.de/viewtopic.php?t=14709
Comments welcome!
N8, Johannes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of my pics: http://album.digitalfotonetz.de/search.php?search_user=perelandra
