Ah, a voice of reason. You're probably right!
David Zaninovic wrote:
I think that this program just marks bad pixels so that they are interpolated from neighboring pixels when picture is saved to memory card.
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Oswald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: Hot pixels
My suspicion is that it is probably not real good for the CCD chip to run this "program" too often. Don't think of it as wiping the black-board. Think of it as sanding and retexturing the surface of the blackboard. You only have so many times you can do that sort of thing before the surface wears thin. :) At best, this is a rough comparison. But it is entirely possible that the energy used to wake up bad CCD pixels is enough to do some degree of wear on all pixels.
If that is the case, Pentax may have not made it a built-in feature out of fear that people might go nuts and do it every few days until the CCD chip is toast.
This is all speculation. Maybe an engineer could chime in. ;)
Frits W�thrich wrote:
on my Olympus digital P&S this is build in. Olympus advises to run this once a year. pity Pentax didn't do this
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 17:11, David Zaninovic wrote:
FJW> They should give us the program so we don't have to wait 4 weeks for this.
FJW>
FJW> ----- Original Message ----- FJW> From: "Peter Smekal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FJW> To: <[email protected]>
FJW> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:59 AM
FJW> Subject: Re: Hot pixels
FJW>
FJW>
FJW> > Interesting. So they just "eliminate" the hot pixels with a program. Do you
FJW> > think they could do the same with stuck pixels?
FJW> > Peter
