Thanks Frank. I hadn't planned a vote, but it's running about 4-1 in favor of no flash.
Paul


On Apr 13, 2005, at 10:26 PM, frank theriault wrote:

On 4/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Yes, it was flat light. But warm flat light can be nice for flowers. Here's the side by side.
No flash:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278916


Flash:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3275980

I like them from straight on. Particularly when the cone and petals are a different color. I've shot them from a lot of different angles as well, but head-on is ?robably my favorite daffodil look. That's highly subjective of course.


Okay, now that I see them both, I like no-flash much better.

It's more subtle, to be sure, but it's that sublety that I like.
Besides, the flash undermines that lovely DOF of the leaves - the
brightly lit ones in the background stand out too much;  even if
they're OOF, you don't get that lovely effect as you do in the
no-flash photo.

Are we voting here?  Put a check in the "no-flash" box for me.  <g>

cheers,
frank



--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson




Reply via email to