So, would you care to repeat that a third or fourth time <LOL> I'm curious as to why this particular photo has so much interest for you ... you've little good to say about it, yet you keep coming back to it and repeating yourself.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Anthony Farr > ... However I still think that the tonal quality of this shot is below > par except for that one puzzling part of the composition - the man on the > right who isn't even the nominal subject. He alone is expertly rendered.
