I just had a similar experience with an F 80-200mm f/4.7-5.6. It's a dum-dumb lens in the first place, but such a convenient size, and actually a little sharper than my similarly dumb-dumb 80-320. So I bought one on eBay for $61 including shipping. It was described as being in "great" condition, having received "light and gentle" use.

So it arrived, with fungus under the front element, serious smudges on the rear element, and brassing on the rear apperture coupling lever. That, to me, is indicative of a lens that's been rattling around in a camera bag with no rear cap on it. And the fungus is definately not what one would consider "great" condition. Looking through the lens toward an incandescent light, I can also see some partial fogging inside the lens. I'm not sure what that is.

I have sent three emails to the seller in the last four days, and haven't received a response. I guess I'm just holding off until tonight, at which time I'll have to file a "Item received not as described" grievance with eBay and let them go to work on tracking down the seller. I know I didn't waste much on the lens, but it's still aggrevating. It really gripes me when I think of how much care I go to in maintaining my own equipment.

Henri Toivonen wrote:
I receieved that 105/2.8 that I thought I got dirt cheap today.

The aperture blades are stuck at the smallest aperture, they won't nudge when I push the lever.
Fun. Crap. Just like it wasn't enough that I had a harddrive failure yesterday, ofcourse the one with all of my pictures. Thank god I managed to save them with a rescue application though.


But now this, sheesh. I just sent an email to the seller that it was broken, and this won't do.

But is there a slim chance that this is something I can fix myself? Or should I just send the crap back where it came from?

/Henri





Reply via email to