Re: PESO - Man Made

[Paul Stenquist]

I think is well executed. It serves well as a presentation of the 
architecture. I also feel that the post-processing is fine. I don't see 
any evidence of over sharpening or other aberrations. The color and 
contrast are quite nice. The composition and framing are good. I guess 
it doesn't interest me a great deal in terms of content. But it is a 
good example of this type of photograph and demonstrates the technical 
skill of the photographer.
On Apr 24, 2005, at 5:06 PM, John Forbes wrote:

I like it.  The building has an almost human quality, with what look 
like eyes and the teeth.  The result is that it's rather sinister, and 
therefore interesting.

John
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:02:57 +0100, Bruce Dayton 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'll be curious to see what you think.  This is quite a change of pace
for me.  It caught my eye due to the geometric patterns from the
different building materials used and the lighting - early morning.
Pentax *istD, K 200/2.5, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/500 sec
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1756.htm
Convert from Raw to 16 bit tiff in Capture One LE, tweaked a bit in
Picture Window Pro and sized/sharpened for web in BreezeBrowser.
Comments always welcome.


--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 21/04/2005