Very nice Jens, the mother and daughters body positions
tell the story, they're having fun!
Nice shot.

Don

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 10:17 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: PESO: Small family at the sea side
>
>
> Yeaterday, I came across this, driving along the coast:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/10710619/
>
> Regards
> Jens Bladt
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
>
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sendt: 25. april 2005 05:03
> Til: [email protected]
> Emne: Re: FAJ 18-55 vs. Zenitar 16 Fisheye
>
>
> On 23 Apr 2005 at 10:10, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> > Too much math, not enough photography .... I don't understand
> the need for
> > equations, nor do I understand the math, the equations, or your
> conclusion.
> >
> > Like I said, the field of view, regardless of your math, is greater with
> > the Zenitar than it is with a 20mm lens on a 35mm camera. Have
> you looked
> > through both focal lengths on a 35mm camera?  Have you actually compared
> > photos side-by-side?
>
> From a practical perspective you are of course correct Shel, the fisheye
> lens
> will provide a wider AOV than the a rectilinear lens of equal
> focal length.
> However due to the physics you will find that the fisheye effect
> diminishes
> as
> the image is cropped (and this can be easily described in mathematical
> terms,
> as Cory showed). So a 16mm fisheye on an APS sized DSLR frame
> looks far less
> fishy than you might expect.
>
> Cory said: "So, what I *meant* to say is that FOV of the fisheye is about
> equivalent to a 13-14mm rectilinear lens on the -DS, or a 20mm rectilinear
> lens on a full-frame 35mm body."
>
> How I interpreted that paragraph was that a 16mm lens on a D or DS body
> produces an angle of view roughly equivalent to the AOV a 20mm lens will
> provide on a full frame 35mm body, and I agree.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
>
>

Reply via email to