Thanks, makes sense. I can understand how rotating in non-90 degree increments could alter an image.

I'd say in practice, casually observing, and not trying to see it, I haven't detected it. Good to keep in mind though.

Tom C.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Boris' workflow (was Concerned)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:54:49 +1000

Quoting Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Please explain how rotating an image can lose subtle transitions...
>

All the pixels get moved around and their position in the new version must be
calculated, some juggling must be done in order to get it all back together again.
I thought it was accepted that rotation of a bitmap image caused degredation
(the degree of which would be quite variable).



------------------------------------------------------------ This email was sent from Netspace Webmail: http://www.netspace.net.au





Reply via email to