I've done tons of comparison shots between the 10D and *ist DS. Given
proper exposure and a comparable lens, I don't find there much
difference that is significant in the image quality. Most of the
differences have to do with handling and rendering qualities of the
lenses. The 20D is faster than the 10D and perhaps a little bit cleaner
at high ISO, but speed has never been one of my primary concerns ...
the 10D is fast enough for most of my photography.
Godfrey
On Apr 28, 2005, at 3:22 PM, Tom C wrote:
Me...? Sarcasm...)
Actually I was hoping you'd have a chance to do a few mild scientific
comparison shots... but I guess not...
Tom C.
From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Slow down, you're goin' too fast
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:15:21 -0400
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Slow down, you're goin' too fast
> I'd like to keep hearing more about the 20D and how it compares to
the
*ist
> D. Do you still have the *ist D as well?
>
It's on eekbay right now and ends Saturday.
In the near future I will write up a little comparison and the whys
and hows
of switching from Pentax to Canon if anyone is interested. (unless of
course
the above statment by Tom is sarcasm...)
Christian.
