Rather one sided views the authors have.
For instance brain dead, and continued existance of the spirit does not necessarily contradict each other. One is of the body, the other is not. It is like the the computer is burned out, but we can not get rid of it because we want to keep the program it was running.
Morals are culturally dependant, genocide is evil. Where did I say my values are not culturally molded just like about everybody elses? Also morals, ethics, and ethos are three different things.
People should be judged upon merit, but restitution is not necessarily based on that. Now if they asked should people be given special consideration because their grandparents were treated unjustly, I would have answered no.
I guess my point is that knowledge and feelings are two different things. If I answered the questions purely one way or the other I would have had a zero score, but the questions were not worded that way. Some were asking for beliefs, while others were asking for feelings at least by my interpertation of them.
But then thinking about it a bit I guess that is the same for all of these little tests, they say more about the test makers than about the test takers.
graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" -----------------------------------
Tom Reese wrote:
Bob W wrote:
"Pain? Tension? Nervous headache?
For fast-acting relief, try PHC.
http://www.philosophers.co.uk/games/check.htm";
13%. I may be full of $#!T but I'm consistent.
I enjoyed that Bob. Thanks for posting it.
Tom Reese
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.6 - Release Date: 5/6/2005
