On 5/13/05, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand (some) of your reservations. > The photograph is meant to be part of a Camera Club Exibtion (Christmas > time) on the Southern Harbour in my home town. > > The reason is, that the harbour environment will disappear/change during the > next decade: > As a city planner, I am the project manager of the renewal project, which > will convert this industrial area into new homes, shops, offices, cultural > facilities etc. etc. > > As a camera club member I participate in documenting the facts and > atmosphere of this disappearing part of town. > > The Seagul picture was an attempt to make one of those typical (cliche) > "Camera Club Photographs", that I never really bothered to make myself. > > BTW: A colleague of mine, who has a master degree in arts, suggested I > should crop it a bit at the bottom, which I did: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/13683598/
Flickr tells me that photo's been deleted. In any event, now knowing what you just told us in the above post does change things just a bit, not in terms of whether I like or dislike the photo, but in terms of understanding that you were working within various parameters that caused you to decide to forego certain compositional considerations. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
