Ugly yes, a better than 1.5 crop (1.37, still not what I'd like to see
but a step in the right direction), 10mp and a price between the Canon
16mp and Kodak 13mp offerings. It's a better alternative and looks more
viable than I had expected. I wonder how many they need to sell to
break even.
Bob Blakely wrote:
Still not 24x36.
Yup, fugly.
Regards,
Bob...
------------------------------------------------
"A picture is worth a thousand words,
but it uses up three thousand times the memory."
From: "Derby Chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Seems like it is finally going to come out. Interesting to see the
back writes to DNG as its raw format. Interesting too that Leica have
turned a design constraints - there wasn't enough space to fit an AA
filter - into a design feature.
Still think its a fugly camera, though :)
warning: article is a rather large pdf, and contains some (tasteful)
nipples.
http://lfi.portrix.net/ceemes/base.php?webfile/show/454/
--
A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
--Groucho Marx
