On 5/16/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doh! Messed up the URLs: > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/20p.htm > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/20q.htm > > Comments and critique always appreciated.
I'll echo the others who like the first one (20p). It's just amazing. I think that the second (20q) rather suffers next to it, perhaps because it's b&w, and therefore may take a few seconds to "adjust" to after the colour shot (not expressing myself well here...). I do like it - the lighting is wonderful, with that central stalk being brighter and therefore separated from the rest. I don't think this one's as instantly breathtaking as the first, but it has a certain subtlety about it that I really like. On the right wall, in the right room, it would work a lot better than 20p. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
