But what is wrong with just documenting and letting the viewer interpret the scene much like they would had they been there?

There are occasions when a lot of time is spent trying to make a picture 'perfect' in everyone's eyes and relating a viewpoint.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar,

C�sar
Panama City, Florida

Shel Belinkoff wrote:

Perhaps you'll better understand Brooks' remark when you've read the
article.  My understanding is that you are making something more than just
a picture of something.  You are creating an interpretation of what you
see, making something that tells a story, stimulates, excites, provokes
thought, as opposed to just a straight document of an object.  That you are
creating something that, on one level, has something of its own life apart
from that of a picture of an object.

Recently someone posted a pic of a wine cork. It was well exposed. It was
a wine cork. However, it was nothing more than a pic of a wine cork. Had
there been some creative lighting, a more interesting angle, a different
exposure, another or different objects on the table, the picture would have
been more than just a document. It might have told or alluded to a story
of a romantic evening, a broken date, an alcoholic or someone who had drunk
too much wine ...


Shel




[Original Message]
From: Bob W





That you are not making a picture of something, but that you are MAKING SOMETHING, should be etched into the mind of every photographer,

I don't understand what you mean by this. You are making a picture of
something. That's what photography is. Otherwise, what is the something


you


are making?





Reply via email to