-----Original Message----- From: pancho hasselbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18. mai 2005 22:10 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Pentax 16-45/4 or Sigma 18-50/2,8
Cotty wrote: > On 18/5/05, Tim �sleby, discombobulated, unleashed: > > Cottys English is a bit to sophisticated for this Norwegian (me), I don�t understand this. So I guess I have to do what I always does when somebody says something I don�t understand. I'll give him a punch at the nose, just in case, it might be offensive. ;-) Silly jokes aside. Pancho wrote: >if you do low light photography I would recommend one or two fast >primes, as Godfrey suggested. Prime lenses seems to be the best alternative for lowlight photographing, but... The thing is. Prime lenses for Pentax are hard to get in Norway. Another thing is that I am a bit sceptic on changing lenses to much (dust on sencor).
