The openings in the trees create huge areas of black. That would throw the exposure off somewhat, casing some overexposure in the foreground. Would it make enough difference to cause the problem shown here? Hard to say. Test your exposures with a color chart and a gray card in diffuse light.
Paul
On May 20, 2005, at 7:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hey gang.

Getting back from day one of a 3 day horse show.
Received my D2H back the other day, that went in for an over exposure concern. I had a
chance to
test it out to day,at the show,plus also read some of the posts from Unka Mikes original
thread on
exposure books etc.


I have come to the conclusion that not all manufactures agree on what a good exposure is.
See link below.


                http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/nikon_1.jpg   

No adjustment has been made other than resizing for web.

Camera was set on iso 250 in Tv mode of 1/250. As you can see the day is very sunny. Even
i have
learnt(g)from the pdml that the exposure for this shot,using the S16 rule should have been
in the
neighbourhood of 1/250 and around f 11.


The tech data from the camera was 1/250 F3.00. Close to -1.0 to -1.5 ev was needed. I
can't seem to
get across to some tech people that the camer work fine before they replaced the AE board
last
winter.<g>


Now you tell me. Am i nuts,or so stupid that i cannot work a camera properly, or is there
a problem
with not only this, but 99% of the stuff i tested today. If i'm stupid, don't hold back
folks:-)



Sorry for the rant. I'm just royaly P#$O&^'D off today as you can wel imagine.


BTW, I don't get this kind of exposure on my istD at all,nor the D1.

Dave    





Reply via email to