In a message dated 5/26/2005 8:58:45 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As for her having skin cancer, well, that's a fascinating guess, but I don't know how accurate it is, as she was part of a group (maybe four or five people) who were wrapped in such a robe. Of course, you'd have no way of knowing that. Had you seen the group would you have thought they all had skin cancer? I'm asking because I'm curious as to how the context might affect your thinking.
Now, had I toned down the highlights to a degree that they were disappeared, would you still think she was squinting? Maybe your understanding of a squint is different than mine, as she doesn't appear to be squinting to me. Again, I'm not arguing with you or trying to be difficult, just explaining what I see. BTW, if you missed my original post on this, I don't care for the pic very much myself, and the only reason I put it up was to see if others thought it was as bad as I, or if it could be redeemed somehow. So on at least one level we're in complete accord ;-)) Shel =========== Well, a whole group of old people could be worried about skin cancer, yeah. Or their care taker/giver could be. Or they could be Hindu or something. Although she didn't seem to be. Accord is good. :-) I was just offering explanations why I thought it appeared to me she is squinting -- maybe not good explanations :-). Still think so, which doesn't mean she didn't looking in another direction for just a second after/pre squint. Sometimes, truthfully, there is NO explanation for why something looks some particular way to me. It just does. When I further try to explain it, sometimes I just dig a deeper hole. Better to go with my first overall take on something. HTH, which I know it doesn't. <g> Marnie aka Doe
