Maybe they think that they can challenge Rollie for the DMF market.
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I hope they begin to see it as a misstep. An expensive MF digital is a
hugh non-mover. The whole format question no longer revolves around 35
vs MF except for old lenses.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/26/05 9:40 PM >>>
Based on history, the bone from Pentax isn't due for at least a few
more months. They're never going to release more than one new digital
SLR in a year. And while the D645 seemed a misstep, that announcement
may have been only a frantic attempt to remain in the MF market for a
while pending future development. I doubt if it precludes another DSLR
in the interim. I remain somewhat optimistic and quite satisfied with
the *istD.
Paul
On May 26, 2005, at 7:50 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 27 May 2005 at 0:45, John Forbes wrote:
I hope Pentax will survive as a quirky niche player offering
petite,
highly ergonomic bodies and some superb lenses.
For those Pentax doesn't, and won't, support, we can only say
farewell.
But for the other 98%, come on in, the water's lovely. Okay, it's a
bit
chilly at the moment, but it'll warm up.
I hope that they will survive too but I'm not reading their situation
with
quite the positive twist you seem to be, I'd say that there was an
ice
layer
forming on the pond at this stage, heading where we can only
guess...
Practically they really aren't throwing us any bones at the moment
are
they?
John
PS: Because I, too, was a little concerned about the future (I read
too
many Herb Chong posts), I bought a second D body.
That both helped Pentax and gave me a backup/source of spares.
Brave man.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
--Groucho Marx
