On 29/5/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed: >No. But thanks for the reminder. I want to do that. But your jpeg does >look quite good. Is it right out of the camera or post-processed in PS? >My comment below is in regard to jpegs that have been processed only by >the camera. Of course their all dependent on photographer's settings, >exposure, etc. But I haven't really seen any I like that haven't been >post processed -- Pentax or Canon. Ironically, some of the jpegs from >P&S cameras look pretty good as shot. My daughter has a 4 megapixel >Canon Elph that produces reasonably nice results as shot.
The jpeg is straight from the camera, nothing done to it at all. Would appreciate your expert eye over it! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
