On Mon, 30 May 2005, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Are you sure you mean the "M" version? I thought the > one critically acclaimed was the 28mm F3.5 "K" > version, not the "M" version which is totally > different design....
Not sure what Don thinks, but http://stans-photography.info/ suggests it is a great lens too; it's the 2.8s that people don't quite like. I was told (off list) that the 2.8s perform well on digital though! Kostas
