Thanks for conferming my suspisions.

I am thinking of replacing my S800 (head keeps going on it)with this one or the 
6000
model.

Dave          

                                > I bought this to replace an HP DJ3820, which 
I 
bought before taking up 
> digital photography, and was never really a serious photo-printer. 
> 
> The iP6000D isn't small, with an A3-size footprint, nor was it cheap at
U> K 
> �199. I bought it because it was what the local good photographic shop 
> (Campkins of Cambridge) recommended, with sample prints to support their 
> claims, and because it closes up properly to keep dust out, the HP
having>  
> been a real pain on those grounds. 
> 
> The printer has surprisingly thorough connectivity, with USB 2.0 and 
> drivers for Windows and Mac, a Direct Print socket for PictBridge or 
> Canon's equivalent, CF and SD slots (which seem to be usable as card
slot> s 
> for the computer if you want) plus a display and controls for using it 
> without a computer, and an IR port for printing from phones. 
> 
> It sheet feeds A4 and US Letter from the top rear, and has an internal 
> paper tray for A4/Letter down to enprint sizes. It also has an adaptor
an> d 
> software for printing on CDs, although it doesn't auto-feed those. 
> 
> The Windows install was trouble-free, the automatic print head alignment 
> worked OK, and status monitor and warnings are definitely a level ahead
o> f 
> the HP. The very first print - on plain paper - was entirely acceptable. 
> On its own "Photo Paper Pro" the results are very fine indeed. With
JPEGs>  
> from the *istD and FA50/1.4, it isn't quite Cibachrome quality, but it's 
> the next thing to it. 
> 
> Being a Canon, it takes six ink tanks (Black, Yellow, two Cyan and two 
> Magenta), plus a separate print head. I don't yet know how long the ink 
> lasts. Canon's paper is about �11 for a pack of 15 A4 sheets, probably 
> less if you hunt around. It prints borderless very nicely, and it's
quiet>  
> and reasonably quick, at about two minutes for an A4 with everything 
> turned on. Oh, and the prints /smell/ like photographs. 
> 
> Well worth a look. I'm very pleased with it. 
> 
> -- 
> PDML means I get more e-mail than spam!
> 


                                


Reply via email to