On 31/5/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:

>I guess that was my point.
>People don't realize sometimes just how big the big Canon is.
>It's something to consider when you are wishing for performance enhancement 
>features though.

I think it appears big when all one is used to is smaller gear. I enjoy
the MX, which is very small. But holding a Canon, I don't consider it
unduly big. I must be odd. It feels like any top of the range film SLR
with a motor drive and battery attached. It does get a tad heavy with a
big lens, but an *ist D with the 80-200 2.8 aboard is no featherweight!

....relatively speaking of course :-)




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   |     People, Places, Pastiche
||=====|    http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________


Reply via email to