You guys <headshake> are full of it.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Frantisek wrote:
Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 12:57:43 PM, Kostas wrote:
KK> On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The size of the lens mount factors into the equation. The large sensor
works on the 645 because it has a large lens mount. Ditto the Canon.
KK> So, is a "FF" sensor bigger in actual dimensions than film? Why the
KK> difference?
Optics. The wider the lens mount, the more freedom have the optical
designers. And as digital sensors do need optics that have more
coincident rays than say a film Leica, larger lens mount means
benefits in that.
Personally, I would like a FF sensor just because there currently are no
superfast lenses in APS format. Like Nikon's excellent 1.4/28mm or
Canon's 1.4/24mm lenses, which quite loose their purpose on 1.5/1.6
crop cameras... Once we get f/1 16mm lenses for APS, that could
change.
Good light!
fra
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.3.3 - Release Date: 5/31/2005
