That's wide enough for me, too.
(12-50? I thought it was a 12-24).
The fact that this lens is soon to be released is the only
reason why I don't yet own the 16-45.
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:22:29PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The forthcoming Pentax DA 12-50 will give 18mm rectilinear angle of view on
> the *istD(S). That's wide enough for anything I shoot.
> Paul
>
>
> > The problem I see is that there is still no real wide angle solution,
> > unless you go Canon.
> >
> > John Francis wrote:
> >
> > >On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:47:37PM +1000, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Has there been any more word on the MF Pentax 22Mp?
> > >>Is it just trial or is there a release date?
> > >>
> > >>Kind regards
> > >>Kevin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >There is no MF 22Mp. There will be an 18Mp within the next
> > >twelve months (larger sensor than 35mm, smaller than 645),
> > >if current plans are followed.
> > >There may be a new low-end 35mm first, but the MF digital
> > >will come out before any follow-on to the *ist-D.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
> > --Groucho Marx
> >
