Bruce wrote: > The sad thing about this is, that Pentax has to be WAY better than > Canon or Nikon to be able to get any attention. There is no way for > any other manufacturer to be WAY better than Canon. They can be a > little bit better all the way around, but it won't matter much.
My original dissapointment over the *istD was that it wasn't funky enough and didn't offer the design flair in order to get attention. I think Pentax need to design DSLR that looks less "me too". Pål
