On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:19:52PM +0100, John Whittingham wrote: > > As another spin-off from the looong "why choose *istDL" thread, I > > thought I might mention that I completely agree with the whoever-it- > > was who said that what he'd really like to see, was something that > > might be described as a digital version of the MZ-5n (or ZX-5n.) > > Like that other person, I'm not sure it would make sense from a > > marketing viewpoint - although it would at least have some features > > that would clearly distinguish it from the competitors, which is > > often a Good Thing. > > Bring it on, I'll have two please :)
Don't forget the newest lenses have no aperture ring.
