Personal attacks, eh Mishka? I know how to read, but you don't know
what you're talking about. Use one for a few days. Then you won't be
spouting such nonsense.
Paul
On Jun 3, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Mishka wrote:
man, would you ever learn to read?
i haven't said "others have better finder" or
"k-lenses don't work". they do.
i said, the finder is lousy (and i check it in b&h today: it is lousy).
and the mount is crippled.
read the sentence above again. rinse. repeat.
best,
mishka
On 6/3/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Look through the viewfinder of any dslr. I haven't seen one that's
better than the *istD. As for the mount, if you had ever used the
camera, you would know that it works great with K and M lenses. It's
not even an issue. You tap the green button to meter. Not a problem.
Easier than metering with many Pentax film cameras. It's interesting
that you're so adamant about this, but you haven't tried it yourself.
Very strange.
Paul
On Jun 3, 2005, at 7:23 AM, Mishka wrote:
i looked through the finder. it sucks. i don't care that canon rebel
has a worse one.
the *istd finder still sucks.
the mount is crippled.
but i meant my email not as criticism of *istD*, quite on contrary.
best,
mishka
On 6/3/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Pentax digital mount is not crippled in any way. The viewfinder
is
quite possibly the best of any digital SLR.
Paul
On Jun 2, 2005, at 11:09 PM, Mishka wrote:
