Well, I'm sure you'll get a lot of good reasons from folks telling you why
the MZ-S is worth the difference in price. I haven't seen that much money's
worth in feature differences, myself, but that's only *my* opinion. At
current PZ-1p prices, you could pretty much buy two of them for the price of
an MZ-S. Is an MZ-S worth twice as much as a PZ-1p? I haven't seen
anything that would convince me of that, so far. I do, however, plan to
give one a test drive to see if I will buy one or not.
Len
---
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Geilenkirchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: MZ-S (Please help me understand)
>
>
> Hi all! I'm an avid reader of this list (since I feel I
> don't know enough
> to provide solid info) and have enjoyed gaining some good
> knowledge from the
> group. I'm hoping to gain another bit of insight if possible.
>
> Throughout the planning and release of the MZ-S the talk on
> the list has
> been one of great innovation and wonderful progress with the
> new body. The
> point I'm having trouble with is when I do a comparison
> between the PZ-1P
> and the MZ-S on the Pentax site, they look like the same
> basic camera with a
> couple of different bells and whistles (although the
> interface is pretty
> cool). Thus, I can't really justify how the MZ-S is about
> double the PZ-1P.
>
> Please help me find how I can make the transition in my mind
> to tell myself
> that I can spend $400+ more on the MZ-S.
>
> Have a great day,
>
> Jeff
> Elk Grove, CA
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
