Hi Dave, It is nice to see another Linux fan. The LCD project is pretty cool. I have not done anything like that myself but I managed to get ASP.NET running on one of our Linux servers at work. Now we can dump MS$ stuff :) Anyway it seems Linux, Pentax and old Dodge's seem to go together.
Mike On Saturday 11 June 2005 05:38 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ------------------------------ > > Content-Type: text/plain > > pentax-discuss-d Digest Volume 05 : Issue 1353 > > Today's Topics: > Re: OT - Competition Time [ David Mann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: Photos getting done... slowly [ David > Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: Speaking of GFM....... [ > Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: I think i'm the last GFMer to ch > [ Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: Speaking of GFM....... > [ Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: A few GFM 2005 snaps > [ Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] RE: From today's dawg show. > [ "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: OT - Competition Time > [ Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: OT - Competition Time [ Cotty > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: OT - Competition Time [ Cotty > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] PAW - "Rusty Nail" [ David Mann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] MX Screen in Z1 (and vice versa?) [ > Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: FS: Soft case for Super A & Prog [ > Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: MX Screen in Z1 (and vice versa? [ > Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: PAW - "Rusty Nail" > > [ David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Re: PAW - "Rusty Nail" > [ Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Re: MX Screen in Z1 (and vice > versa? [ Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Second GFM picture & Raw-Jpg > questio [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:28:22 +1200 > From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: OT - Competition Time > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > On Jun 11, 2005, at 9:46 AM, Cotty wrote: > > Okay punters, I had a modification made to my [work] camera today. > > (snip) > > My guess was along the lines of an unhappy subject punching it which > resulted in a bent camera and a black eye via contact with the eyepiece. > > But as far as I can tell the camera looks undamaged. In fact the > lack of duct tape suggests that it's quite a new one. > > Now that I look closer, that rubber eyecup looks like it's up the > wrong way - the bit that's sticking out should be on the other side. > If you tried to look into it with your right eye you'd hit it, and > your nose would drive it into your eye instead of having it fold > back. And that would hurt. > > As for who would do that, I have no idea. Maybe you did it before > your first Earl Grey of the day :) > > Cheers, > > - Dave > > http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:31:31 +1200 > From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Photos getting done... slowly > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > On Jun 11, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Rick Womer wrote: > > Alas...no real ale! Not a handpump in sight. I'll bet > > the beer was better there 75 years ago! > > Yeah it probably doesn't have that fresh lead taste anymore (from the > pipes). > > I remember hearing a story years ago, which could have been an urban > legend. Apparently a guy had died of long-term lead poisoning and > the investigators eventually found that he was always the first into > the pub when it opened each day, so his first pint would contain beer > that had been sitting overnight in the lead pipes. > > Cheers, > > - Dave > > http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:41:30 -0500 > From: Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Speaking of GFM....... > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > Tom, > > Great to see that you will be there. I really did not have any chance > to talk to you at the NPW. > > Not ignoring you in the least, > > C�sar > Panama City, Florida > > Graywolf wrote: > > Most likely all the usual suspects. > > > > Doug Brewer > > Bill Owens > > Mark Roberts > > Cesar Matamoros > > Bob Sullivan > > Some lurkers > > Myself > > > > > > > > Actually the only reason I go to NPW is to see people. The Camera > > Clinic is more my thing, I actually go to the presentations. > > > > graywolf > > http://www.graywolfphoto.com > > "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" > > ----------------------------------- > > > > Scott Loveless wrote: > >> Anybody going to the camera clinic in August? > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:45:45 -0500 > From: Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: I think i'm the last GFMer to check in > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > Tom Reese wrote: > > Ann Sanfedele wrote: > >>> Sue has grandchildren? > >> > >> whaaat! grandmother??? "she was born a coal > >> miner's daughter..." ? > >> > >> Tom tell Sue we need her secret - :) > > > > Her secret is......ME!!!!!!!!!! I am the ultimate anti-aging treatment. > > > > Actually, it's the fact that she shot some slide film last weekend. > > She turned the clock back 20 years in those couple of days. Slide film > > is good for you. I use it every day and it's done wonders for me. You > > should try some today. You won't believe how good you (and your > > pictures) look. > > > > Yea, brothers and sisters, repent your evil digital wickedness. Return > > to the one true faith and worship the great film Ektachrome. Walk with > > me in the path of full frame sharp as a tack color and you and your > > pictures will return to the glorious color and sharpness of the past. > > > > Your photographic salvation is at hand brothers and sisters. The light > > table does not lie. You will find what you seek in the loupe. > > > > Tom (Preaching the Word) Reese > > I am hearing you loud and clear! > > I just picked up the medium format film from the mountain this afternoon. > My goodness, the 6x7 negatives make the 645 slides look like a 110 :-) > > Maybe got a shot of me carting my medium format gear on the mountain - I > recall Annsan being around with her camera... > > I need to take my LXen out for a spin soon, > > C�sar > Panama City, Florida > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:40:15 -0500 > From: Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Speaking of GFM....... > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > I got the confirmation, I am attending the Camera Clinic - that is if > the mission scheduling permits it. I am thinking that it will. > > Only 9.25 hours away, > > C�sar > Panama City, Florida > > Scott Loveless wrote: > >Anybody going to the camera clinic in August? > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:59:33 -0500 > From: Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: A few GFM 2005 snaps > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > Excellent Ann! > > You will note the Sekonic L398 Studio Deluxe hanging from my right > shoulder, a sekonic L-358 Flashmeter hanging from my left shoulder > partially hiding my 645n, and of course I am cradling my 67 in my hands... > There are a couple of lenses for the 67 in the vest pockets too :-) > > Film is dead my *** :-) > > Keep preaching brother Tom, the ears of the uninformed are opening, > > C�sar > Panama City, Florida > > Ann Sanfedele wrote: > ><snip> > >Wheatfield off camera is Frank's subject > >http://users.rcn.com/annsan/donedcesarfrank.jpg > > > ><snip> > >all digital dark side stuff > > > >annsan > >sweltering in New Yawk > >needing to do other stuff > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:12:59 +0100 > From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: From today's dawg show. > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > "A woman's preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not > done well, but you are surprised to find it done at all." > Dr. Johnson > > -- > Cheers, > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 11 June 2005 02:47 > > To: Pentax Discuss > > Subject: From today's dawg show. > > > > Just a fun snapshot, really. > > > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/dawg_show/_IGP7376.jpg > > > > William Robb > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:37:16 +0100 > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "pentax list" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: OT - Competition Time > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > On 10/6/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed: > >Is there some reason it says Gene Wilder? > > Nearly there Marnie, but answers 1, 2, 3 please ;-) > > > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > > _____________________________ > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:42:52 +0100 > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "pentax list" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: OT - Competition Time > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > On 10/6/05, cbwaters, discombobulated, unleashed: > >1: Gene Wilder > >2: wrote his name > >3: you made a scowl and did the "that's right, we bad" walk all the way > >home.. > > 2 out of 3 there Ceeb. I'll give you and Butch half a ceegar each. > > 3 should be: Put a big smile on my face :-) > > Gene Wilder was in town autographing his book in an Oxford bookstore, we > got 10 minutes with him to film a quick interview. I'm a big fan (Young > Frankenstein days) and there was a black marker pen...... > > He looked very old, but the warmth from his heart was still there. > > > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > > _____________________________ > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:44:28 +0100 > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "pentax list" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: OT - Competition Time > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > On 11/6/05, Butch Black, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>1. Who made the modification. > > > >from the writing on the flap I'll guess Gene Wilder > > > >>2. What the modification was. > > > >His signature > > > >>3. The result of the modification upon my face. > > > >black magic marker bleed through signature > > LOL. That bit hangs out the back. > > 2 out of three. Share a cigar with Cory Waters. > > 3 should be: Put a big smile on my face :-) > > Gene Wilder was in town autographing his book in an Oxford bookstore, we > got 10 minutes with him to film a quick interview. I'm a big fan (Young > Frankenstein days) and there was a black marker pen...... > > He looked very old, but the warmth from his heart was still there. > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > > _____________________________ > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 21:09:34 +1200 > From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: PAW - "Rusty Nail" > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > Hi all, > > PAW is almost actually meaning PAW to me again... it's only been two > weeks since my last one ;) > > As the title implies, this is a photo of a rusty old nail. The file > is about 90kb... > > http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?t=PAW&print_id=94 > > As always, comments are welcome. > > Cheers, > > - Dave > > http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 11:49:49 +0200 > From: Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: MX Screen in Z1 (and vice versa?) > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > I just managed (the system to unlock the screen tray is a ***** in Z1 > IMO :) to put my original (split screen) in my Z1 without any problem. > > Maybe I should put the original Z1 one in my MX too ;) > > The only problem is I dunno how much compensation I should dial in. > 1.5 stop I read in another thread? So a 400 ISO film should be set at ? > > ---------------------- > Thibouille > ---------------------- > *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ... > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 11:51:33 +0200 > From: Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: FS: Soft case for Super A & Program Plus > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > Mmm I might be interested. What'd be the price with shipping to Belgium? > BTW, do you have any SuperProgram grip ? I have the motor but when I > remove it, handling the camera without grip isn't that easy... > > ---------------------- > Thibouille > ---------------------- > *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ... > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 11:08:10 +0100 (BST) > From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: MX Screen in Z1 (and vice versa?) > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Thibouille wrote: > > I just managed (the system to unlock the screen tray is a ***** in Z1 > > IMO :) to put my original (split screen) in my Z1 without any problem. > > > > Maybe I should put the original Z1 one in my MX too ;) > > > > The only problem is I dunno how much compensation I should dial in. > > 1.5 stop I read in another thread? So a 400 ISO film should be set at ? > > Your Z-1 now overexposes. I don't know exactly what options you have. > Assuming 1.5 stops, 1000? 1250? If shooting negative it does not > matter very much, but I would err on the side of overxposure (so > perhaps 1000, rather than 1250). Of course if you have a camera with a > meter you can trust, you can do a few side-by-side tests using the > same lens. Not with spot-metering though, this is now unreliable on > your Z-1. > > Kostas > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:34:15 +0800 > From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: PAW - "Rusty Nail" > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > G'day Dave > > Great textures & colour. > > Well caught. > > Dave S > > On 6/11/05, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > PAW is almost actually meaning PAW to me again... it's only been two > > weeks since my last one ;) > > > > As the title implies, this is a photo of a rusty old nail. The file > > is about 90kb... > > > > http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?t=PAW&print_id=94 > > > > As always, comments are welcome. > > > > Cheers, > > > > - Dave > > > > http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 06:59:49 -0400 > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: PAW - "Rusty Nail" > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > I like this. The color and textures are compelling. I wonder if you > could have achieved more with some variation of the framing and > composition. Perhaps not. Good work. > Paul > > On Jun 11, 2005, at 5:09 AM, David Mann wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > PAW is almost actually meaning PAW to me again... it's only been two > > weeks since my last one ;) > > > > As the title implies, this is a photo of a rusty old nail. The file > > is about 90kb... > > > > http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?t=PAW&print_id=94 > > > > As always, comments are welcome. > > > > Cheers, > > > > - Dave > > > > http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 13:38:04 +0200 > From: Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: MX Screen in Z1 (and vice versa?) > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > Did it, set it on iso1000. Seems about accurate. Anyway, negs > shouldn't see much of a difference and I do not (yet?) do slides. > > I wonder how exactly does spot-metering react to this I mean, how > unreliable it is. Is it unpredictable? Totaly useless? I guess the > culprit is the microprism thingie but any other screen (without > microprims) should not cause spot-metering to go unreliable? > > I could use divided screens or scale screens in Z1 without any trouble > (except compensation of course) and keep the spot-metering on? > > ---------------------- > Thibouille > ---------------------- > *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ... > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:32:46 US/Eastern > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Second GFM picture & Raw-Jpg question > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=view¤t=bridge212 >3.jpg > > > This is a favorite of mine, and hopefully yours, from the bridge. Its not > the angle i wanted,but > with all of the people moving around i had to compromise/ Should have shot > this Friday when i was > waiting for Mark. The mist was the same. Oh well, next time. > > Now my PS question. I opened and adjusted this Raw file in PS Elements 3. I > had to save it as a Tiff > file as i was unable to save as Jpg. > I opened it in PS 6 and the same thing,only Jpg format it Jpg2000. > > Any tips here please. I want to send a few to be lab printed and Tiffs are > not allowed just Jpgs. > > Thanks > > Dave > > -------------------------------- > End of pentax-discuss-d Digest V05 Issue #1353 > **********************************************
