I'd agree with John here in terms of using a filter.  Adding and removing
filters throughout a day of shooting can be a bit of a PITA, and digi is
supposed to make things easier for the photog.  It would be great to have a
50 ISO setting - even 100 would be an improvement. As I've said about film,
lower speeds means wider apertures and more creative opportunities.

Shel 


> [Original Message]
> From: John Forbes 

> As William said, why put a filter on a lens if you don't have to?  

> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist"
> > Subject: Re: *ist D discontinued ?
> >
> >
> >> Why would you want ISO 50 sensitivity? At 200, noise is virtually  
> >> unnoticable, and ND filters can be used when slower shutter speeds are

> >> required.
> >
> > I can understand it. I like limited DOF, but tossing an ND filter on
can  
> > really bugger up AF, and these things don't have the best viewfinders  
> > for manual focus.
> > It's not high on my list of wants, but it would be nice to have.
> >
> > William Robb  


Reply via email to