ImageMagik is also compiled for windows. IIRC, someone even tried to
make a GUI for it.
Jostein
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wigwam Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: First *ist Ds shots
Yes and no. Perl runs under Windows, no problem -
www.activestate.com is a freebie. And dcraw has also been compiled
to run under Windows. But I dont think that ImageMagick has been
ported to Windows yet. That's kind of a problem, since as it has
been pointed out, dcraw does not do a perfect job on the image, it
is too dark out of the standard conversion and needs to be massaged
a bit - so I'd need something like ImageMagick that runs under
Windows and has a command-line interface to use in place of
ImageMagic. Then, yes, it should be do-able under Windows as well as
Linux.
Best,
Wiggy
Thibouille wrote:
I'm very intersted in that and any further development you might add
:)
Doable under Win$ ?
2005/6/13, Wigwam Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
That's what I like about Linux/Perl and scripting - do it once, let
the
script do it from there on in. I dump the images in my 'raw'
directory,
my script runs every five minutes, looking for new files to
convert.
Finds one, invokes dcraw, then pipes result to imagemagick, saves
as tif
and jpg - jpg then is ftp'd to my website, all nice and comfy.
Five
minutes after I dump the day's shooting, the proofs are online for
viewing. Not perfect - they're proofs! If I see one that stands
out, I
either go back to the TIF or the RAW and redo it by hand - works a
treat. I figure I manually process one out of thirty or so - if
that.
Most are just dross, but that's ok.
Right now, I'm just ftp'ing jpg files to my website - in the
future, I
hope to have all the EXIF data embedded in an XML file and shot up
with
the jpg, then converted to html when called by a web browser.
Oooh, I
get shivers just thinking about it. Very do-able, I just haven't
gotten
to it yet.
If I have to do it once, that's one thing. If I have to do it
twice,
that calls for a script. Programmers are lazy, that's why we're
cool.
Best,
Wiggy
Herb Chong wrote:
free has certain advantages, but if you have to put in twice as
much
work, how much is your time worth?
Herb...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Wigwam Jones"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: First *ist Ds shots
Works pretty well for me after I feed it to imagemagick, but hey,
it's free. Freeeeeeee. I like that part.
