When did the Argus C33 come out?

Jim A.



> In the movie, it's an Argus C2 (or it should be), produced from 1938
> through
> 1942. The Argus C3 was produced for twenty-seven years from 1939 through
> 1966. The C2 & C3 are essentially identical, the only difference being
> that
> the C2 has no flash sync, whereas the early C3 has flash sync for bulbs.
> Argus offered to retrofit C2's for flash sync and many were, effectively
> making them C3's. Later C3's were available with electronic sync (x-sync)
> and C2's & early C3's can be modified for x-sync. The C (or C1 if you
> will)
> is essentially the same as the C2, except that the rangefinder isn't
> coupled
> to the lens. You adjust the rangefinder, read off the distance and then
> manually adjust the lens. They ALL look like a "brick."
>
> You cannot tell a C2 from a C3 without a close, knowledgeable look.
>
> Regards,
> Bob...
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> "The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose
> as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers
> with the smallest possible amount of hissing."
>  - Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
>    minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
>
> From: "John Celio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>>> Her camera in the movie, looks like an Argus model.
>>> But it the movie is set in 1938 and the camera looks like a
>>> post WWII model.  Can anyone here ascertain that?
>>
>> I'm pretty sure you're correct.  Thing is, the movie is such a mish-mash
>> of 20th-century (and beyond) styles and technologies that, in my mind at
>> least, the age of the camera doesn't really matter.  If you watch the
>> shorter original version of the film (assuming you got the movie on
>> DVD),
>> Polly is using a very old-style 4x5 press camera.  I guess they changed
>> it
>> to something smaller so it'd be easier for her to carry around to all
>> those exotic locations she visits.
>>
>> I loved that movie, too.  Gotta go buy it one of these days.  Watched it
>> twice in one weekend when I borrowed it from a coworker.
>
>

Reply via email to