On 14 Jun 2005 at 19:07, Graywolf wrote: > Kind of the opposite of 'found images' isn't it? > > However, I submit that whether you are talking about 'snapshots', 'found > images', or 'intentional photographs' there are still good ones and bad ones; > and that a good 'snapshot' is better than a bad 'intentional photograph'. > > How much effort you put into a photo does not seem to make much difference > whether a given photo is a good or a bad one, but the percentage of good > photos > goes up a lot with that effort. There is no doubt at all that limited > recording > ability improves ones photography. This is called 'editing in the viewfinder'.
I found it a very irritating and self serving article, the author uses a lot of "we" references when he should obviously be referring to himself. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
