På 17. jun. 2005 kl. 19.23 skrev William Robb:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian"
Subject: Re: How to make Good Pictures (Let's Free the Captured Images)
----- Original Message ----- From: "William Robb"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For me, a photograph is a true reflection of the reality before the
camera.
When the alterations get to the point where there is no longer a true
reflection, I start to have problems.
Statements like this have always bothered me. Photography, by its
very
nature, can never be a "true reflection of the reality before the
camera."
Bill, even you manipulate the "truth" consciously or not. The very
act of
framing a shot is manipulation (avoiding distracting elements,
framing to
avoid the starving child in the happy scene or including the garbage
pile
with the majestic blue heron). The choice of film (crazy saturated
color
with pushed Velvia or B&W) does not give an accurate "truthful"
reproduction
of the scene. The choice of lens (wide angles with distorting
properties;
think big-nosed portraits or telephotos making the moon look
oversized in a
scenic) changes the perspective our eyes see.
Even photojournalism is a manipulation, the photographer showing you
only
what he wants you to see.
Points taken. Photojournalists are probably the worst offenders, since
often they have an agenda, and want pictures to match it.
Thats called visual editorializing, and I don't agree with it.
However, when I say a "true reflection", I mean that quite literally.
A photo can never be more than what it is, which is a two dimensional
rendering of a 3 dimensional reality, that goes with the territory.
Punch up the colours with Velvia and a polarizer if you wish, but
don't start adding or subtracting elements from the scene to suit your
whim.
William Robb
By the way: I have been made aware of a similar discussion (because I
was referred to .-)
http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=11948
I think Caroline has a few good points....
DagT
