> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=7521768496
> Mark, is that of interest to your page?

I might quibble a bit over the subject line.  I do not believe that these
lenses are particularly "special", except for the fancy cosmetic treatment.

In particular, the 70-210/2.8-4 lens simply seems to be the 4th-generation
VS1 70-210, which is not really all that great a lens (it's really quite
pedestrian, compared to its predecessors, in my humble opinion).

At the time these lenses were being made, the "Series 1" name was being
used unashamedly so often by Vivitar, being applied to almost any Vivitar
lens that wasn't a too-obvious bottom-of-the-line consumer lens, that the
once-prestigious VS1 label had become almost a joke.

[Admittedly, I don't have any experience with the 28-105/2.8-3.8, so I
can't apply these comments directly to that lens (although, well...).]

About a year or so ago perhaps, one of these "presentation boxes" of
gold-colored lenses was on eBay, and I looked at it semi-seriously.  The
seller had claimed that the 70-210 was an "f/2.8" lens.  I wrote to him to
verify that (since it would certainly then have been quite an interesting
lens to me), and he claimed in his reply that it was indeed a constant
f/2.8 lens.  I looked at his photos carefully and decided that, despite his
claim to the contrary, and simply because it used 58mm filters (a 210mm
f/2.8 lens would probably use 77mm filters, right?), it just had to be the
4th-generation 70-210.

I have the five VS1 70-210's already (as Mark's web site attests) (and the
first three are all quite good, especially the 2nd and the 3rd) (and the
last, the Q-DOS version, is a lot of fun to use, even if it's otherwise the
same lens as the mediocre 4th-generation).  If the gold 70-210 had been any
of the first three versions, I'd have been very interested.  But not if
it's the 4th...

Rather than "gilding the lily", I think this is an example of "gilding the
dandelion" - <g>.

Finally, if I may "pat myself on the back" a bit, I think it actually was
"discerning" of me to ~not~ have jumped at buying that kit - <g>.

Fred


Reply via email to