building things that are portable across win32 *and* unices,
32 and/or 64 (*), is what i do daily. i have a pretty good idea of
what's involved. it's very doable, and not a big deal, really,
if you write things with portability in mind.

mishka

(*) winxp, mac osx, linux 32, linux 64, irix 64, sunos 64.

On 6/18/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Portable code" is almost an oxymoron.
> ...
> It's a non trivial job.
> 
> Godfrey
> 
> On Jun 18, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Mishka wrote:
> 
> > 32->64 porting is not a big deal, if you have portable code
> >
> >
> > On 6/18/05, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> it's just a question of critical mass. Every time things have
> >> changed (8 to
> >> 16-bit to 32-bit, 86 to 286 to 38s, Dos to Windows, etc.) the same
> >> stories
> >> have been churned out and the same prophets have predicted doom.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >>  Bob
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Thibouille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Sent: 18 June 2005 10:53
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: For those considering WindowsXP 64bit
> >>>
> >>> No. But still interesting to notice that a major company does
> >>> not want to get involved with developing drivers for that OS.
> >>>
> >>> 2005/6/18, Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>
> >>>> to install The Only True OS (that is, linux)?
> >>>>
> >>>> but, in the end, canon claims that it's a lousy software company.
> >>>> is that a news?
> >>>>
> >>>> mishka
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6/17/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: "Thibouille"
> >>>>> Subject: For those considering WindowsXP 64bit
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Just read this:
> >>>>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24004
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We'd better wait...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's pretty much a rehash of what Microsoft themselves is saying,
> >>>>> other than the self serving pap from Canon.
> >>>>> I do wonder why I bothered to buy a 64 bit processor, if the
> >>>>> software writers are going to refuse to support it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> William Robb
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> ----------------------
> >>> Thibouille
> >>> ----------------------
> >>> *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
>

Reply via email to