As much as my statement was meant to be sarcastic (hint: iNtel inside), this guy says otherwise: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20050609.html I don't buy his argument, but then maybe he's not too far off base.
On 6/19/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 18, 2005, at 5:51 AM, Scott Loveless wrote: > > > The upcoming "merger" with Intel (iNtel inside?) > > For a computer manufacturer to use a chip vendor's products does not > constitute a "merger" in any sense of the word. > > Godfrey > > -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- "You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman
