If I have to have the pic for a project or whatever, I'll take it and
decide later what might be the best way to fix it. I might very well
try both sky replacement and enhancement of what is there, then choose
the winner. If I don't need the shot, I will find something else more
worthy of my efforts.
Paul
On Jun 19, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 19/6/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Do you take
the pic anyway and then Photoshop (there's that verb again) in a nice
blue
sky with fluffy white clouds and boost the contrast and saturation to
better depict what you were hoping to photograph in the first place -
a
nice, bright, cheerful landscape? It's done quite often to one
degree or
another. Or do you take what you get, and work with the ominous sky
and
darker, colors, work with what nature provided, adapt to the scene,
and
make a photo that's different from what you intended or hoped for?
Neither - I come back another day! :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________
