Thanks, Markus. But I'm specifically trying to cut down as much weight as possible. I have two other bodies that would work as alternates. The K1000 is a bit bricky, but the *ist and a couple zooms is about as light as it gets. If I'm going to carry two bodies I can just use the F2 with the backpack straps. My goal here is minimalism with a little flexibility thrown in.
On 6/19/05, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Scott > nothing beats a second small body like the Pentax P30 I use for the 24mm for > me. > I use it together with the Pentax SFXn as my main camera equipped with > different lenses > like the 50mm macro, the 90mm Tamron macro or the 35-70, 70-210 A zooms > I would not like to change lenses or film in a hurry or in crowded places a > lot. > greetings > Markus > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Scott Loveless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 7:02 PM > >>To: [email protected] > >>Subject: Camera bags (yet again) > >> > >> > >>Gearing up for the upcoming Philly PDML, I have a dilemma. I'm really > >>intent on doing some street photography with the MX while there. I'd > >>like to carry the body, three primes (28, 50, 85), and a few rolls of > >>film. I think my Domke bag is overkill for that sort of shooting. > >>I've found some backpacks that more or less fit the bill, but I'd > >>rather be able to change lenses and film without with having to stop > >>and remove the pack. I've used a fanny pack when carrying only one > >>extra lens but I have concerns about two lens bouncing around > >>unprotected. Looking at the B and H selection leaves me dumbfounded. > >>Any recommendation on a small, easily accessible bag, designed with > >>mobility in mind? > >> > >>-- > >>Scott Loveless > >>http://www.twosixteen.com > >> > >>-- > >>"You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman > >> > >> > > > -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- "You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman
