On 19 Jun 2005 at 21:42, Butch Black wrote: > Go back to the deep pocket theory. Who would you rather sue? Joe six-pack > net worth $50G or Wally-World, net worth $50B. Plus my guess is that suing the > customer would get the photographer little more then legal costs "But you > Honor, > I just wanted to use the family portrait for my X-mas cards"
Sad, I still can't accept this concept of pushing the blame about to simply obtain the highest return. The courts who allow this type of caper to propagate are partially to blame. It's just all to easy for anyone to assign blame to someone else for their stupidity/deceit days particularly if the blamed have lots of cash and will keep the legal profession in the money. :-( Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
