I've had the Scan Dual IV for over a year. For the price, I think it's
hard to go wrong and hard to justify anything much more expensive (for 35mm
film) for results that are likely, for the most part, indistinguishable.
Good choice.
Tom C.
From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:19:11 -0500
Thanks, you were one of the ones that recommended the Minolta.
Don
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:11 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
>
>
> Very nice, Don. I'm still using the Scan Dual II ... and it's still
> returning beautiful results, albeit a little lower rez than the IV.
>
> Godfrey
>
> On Jun 21, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> > Finally replaced the Prime Film 1800 (POS) Scanner.
> > Here's a scan of a frame of Kodak BW Pro (C41 B&W):
> > http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/Water.htm
> >
> > Scanned as B&W Neg with no correction for the color mask.
> > Levels adjusted in PS-CS, no sharpening.
> > Original scan is 4384x2892, 12.1MB.
> > 1000% improvement over the PFL, much easier AND,
> > no chance of scratching the neg!
> >
> > Don
> >
> >
>
