The re-worked image totally changes the "feel" of this photo. Before it
didn't really have a message, now it does.
David Volkert wrote:
Michael Spivak suggested the idea of separating the boy from the rest
of the photo by blurring the background. Additionally Jerome Reyes
had a good point that the title doesn't fit the photo at all. In
retrospect I should of left it untitled, I can't come up with a well
fitting title. Here's my take on that idea with a similar photo taken
right after the first after the first (its a rough draft, I'm too
tired at the moment to go through and blend the blur correctly)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/22099681/
I like it but it changes the subject of the photo, less about the
interaction of multiple people and more about the boy.
David Volkert wrote:
I don't normally do street photography (at least I think this can be
considered street photography but the lens is a bit on the large side
and it was an event) but the opportunity presented itself today.
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/21768115/
*Ist D, Sigma 135-400mm @ 135mm, F/9.5, and 1/500th
Personally I'd wish for more depth of field on the kid and less on
the people in the background but I still like it.
Comments appreciated.
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
