Yeah but wouldn't the 135/3.5 have been a manual-focus lens William? Do you remember me? Hint: I only use auto-focus and am proud, and that pissed you off. Was a while back, but I'm an elephant. Thanks for the response.
On 7/2/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, William Robb wrote: > > > Valentin thought the 135/3.5 should have been called a soft focus > > lens........ > > ??? > > Do you mean the Takumar 2.5? > > Kostas > >
